🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism in action: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for using excessively that system. Hire the process guy and later discard him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.